Ardor
EnEfG §§ 12–17 · BAFA-aligned

BAFA waste heat reporting for data centres.

For operators in Germany facing annual reporting obligations under EnEfG. Ardor creates the required report in a fixed structure, at a fixed price, then turns the same dataset into a more reliable heat profile.

Germany first. €299 per site. Methodology documented. No sales call required.

31 Mar 2027
Next reporting deadline
€299
Per site
15 min
Data entry time
24h
Target delivery
At a glance
€299
per site
15 min
for data entry
24h
target to PDF
31 Mar 2027
next deadline in Germany

For operators in Germany. Additional jurisdictions are in regulatory preparation.

The compliance problem, not the theory.

Operators do not wake up wanting a heat marketplace. They wake up with a reporting obligation. What they need is a document that holds up internally, is defensible externally, and is not priced like a consulting project.

  • EnEfG- and BAFA-aligned report structure
  • Waste heat quantity and temperature profile
  • Nearby heat-network and off-taker analysis
  • Reasoned feasibility by off-taker
  • Signature-ready operator declaration

Ardor sells the report first, not the vision.

Three steps.

01
Enter facility data

Capture IT load, cooling type, PUE, and location.

02
Review heat profile

Review calculated values, comparison logic, and nearby heat-use assessment.

03
Receive report

Receive the PDF report. The same data can optionally be upgraded into a higher-quality profile for the Ardor infrastructure.

Same problem. Different cost structure.

The inputs are standardised. The methodology is documented. The expensive part of the legacy process is repetitive manual work. Ardor automates that part without softening the regulatory seriousness of the output.

Ardor
€299

Structured workflow, fixed output.

Consultants
€15,000–30,000

Project-based manual work.

Not cheaper because it is less careful. Cheaper because it has less idle process.

Open methodology. Disciplined product logic.

Ardor does not replace trust with branding. Its calculation logic, data sources, and regulatory references are documented publicly. The product is only as strong as the traceability of its assumptions.

Heat Output Calculation Model documented
Regulatory basis referenced publicly
Input values and calculated values clearly separated
Methodology →Regulation →

Not every profile means the same thing.

When Ardor talks about heat data, the quality level should be visible.

Estimated

Public sources plus model assumptions.

Operator-confirmed

Reviewed or amended by the facility operator.

Report-backed

Derived from a completed Ardor compliance assessment.

The report is not only a document. It is a quality upgrade for the data foundation.

The report is the entry point.

Each completed assessment creates a more reliable heat profile than public estimates alone. That is how compliance work becomes market infrastructure. Not all at once. Report by report.

  • Better data quality
  • Clearer matching context
  • Reusable for future reporting years
  • Usable by buyers and partners

What comes after the report.

Ardor is not building a finished European trading portal overnight. It is first building an inventory of reliable heat profiles. Buyer access and matching will roll out in stages on top of that foundation.

For operators

Meet the reporting obligation and build a stronger profile.

For buyers

Request pilot access to an emerging inventory of heat profiles.

For partners

Use a white-label or brokered model on top of structured data.

Curated access. Staged rollout. Report-backed profiles.

Germany is the launch market. Europe is the data strategy.

The commercial starting point is Germany, because that is where regulatory urgency is clearest. Broader European coverage supports the long-term buildout of cross-border heat-data infrastructure.

Not every covered country is at the same product stage. That distinction is intentional, not a weakness.

Reporting first. Market logic second.

If you need a report today, Ardor is built for that. If you want to use the same data tomorrow for matching, renewals, and partner access, that is not a second system. It is the same foundation.

Create reportRead methodology
RegulationContactWhite Paper